Skip to main content

V Shaped Recovery? More like N Shaped Recovery (Part 1).

     The narrative on main-stream media and popular networks such as CNBC continuously perpetuate that the economy is great, that Initial Jobless Claims are declining, and that the stock market is at an all-time high. Everything is good in the world, right? Well, not necessarily. 

    I would first like to bring in question the 10 year Treasury security yield. 

    The usual complacency taking place on CNBC and other mainstream media networks is, to no surprise, that the US economy will create a 'V' shaped recovery, one that has a sharp decline, then suddenly rebounds. This is simply not the case. This chart clearly depicts that. The 10 year Treasury security yield had its last print at 0.6930. If real growth was in fact evident, we would see a rise in inflation which would subsequently cause yields across the curve to increase. This is not happening. Yields are staying flat near the ZLB, and are likely to stay relatively close to the 0% threshold for quite some time, disproving the fallacy that the "economy is better than ever".
    You must realize that there is more to the market than "stocks". 
    I would also like to bring in how the Federal Reserve literally said that they would let their inflationary target run higher than the usual 2%. This will perpetuate extremely high inflation in the future, which is already being shown by a extremely bullish move in commodities, as well as a devaluing dollar. 


    I will expand more upon inflationary expectations and the Federal Reserve balance sheet in other posts in an effort to keep this post short. 
    I would also like to add that there is considerable downside risk even from here for the 10 year yield. For example, the 10 year Bund (German bond) is trading with a yield of -0.394%. So, there is approximate downside of -1.087%. The ECB tried to fix this problem, and BoJ tried to fix this problem, by massive stimulus and the purchasing of high yield/     investment grade ETFs using unlimited funds, but with no success. The United States might be the next victim of negative rates.
 In summary, there is still considerable downside in the 10 year Treasury security. It would be wise to lighten up on Treasury fixed-income exposure, taking down your net Duration measure on your portfolio to reduce exposure to interest rate risk. However, I think keeping an overweight asset allocation to treasuries in a risky portfolio would be wise (depending on the core index/factor model you are using).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What the heck is a skew?

 As a firm believer in the advantages in volatility timing for one's market timing strategies rather than simply traditional surface area of price market timing, I analyze a decent amount of data in the derivatives space. More specifically, the futures and options markets. I focus on ES contracts, which are essentially futures contracts that track the S&P 500 index, but are quoted in smaller notional values than traditional futures contracts on the S&P 500 index, which allows for more liquidity (more people are able to play with more contracts since it is more affordable) and better price discovery (with more market participants on this product, there is inherently more information conveyed, so the chances of arbitrage strategies as a result of an inefficient pricing of the given product is much less likely than the traditional futures contracts). In order to get a sense of what volatility might look like in the future (implied volatility), I analyze options on those ES con...
Post a Comment
Read more

One Last Ride

Since my previous post, the S&P 500 has appreciated +3.19% to $4,535.43, with the VIX and VVIX depreciating by -10.03% and -9.21% to 16.41 and 105.48, respectively. My last callout only truly referenced how participants were pricing butterfly securities, implied correlation, and general futures and options positioning in terms of notional contracts. Even then, it was apparent a decent portion of the market (particularly on the ES side) was extremely bearish, with the vast majority being bullish (as evidenced by a lower VIX/VVIX/vol contract positing, etc.). From peak to trough of the S&P500's worst week in several months, on 8/13/2021 to 8/19/2021, the VIX appreciated by over 40% from 15.45 to 21.67, the SPX falling -1.39% from 4468 to 4405.80, and the VVIX appreciating by over 10% from 117.81 to 130.41. As was stated in the previous post, the primary risk factor to be considered was an overreaction in implied volatility, which was clearly seen in this time frame.  One more...
Post a Comment
Read more

Analysis of Market Breadth

 The SPY is essentially at all time highs, but it is important to have some sort of skepticism here. It should be known that there are only a select few of stocks in the SPX index that are driving the majority of performance. For example, the SPX is at a YTD return of +6.07%, while the S&P 500 equal-weighting index (EWI) (each company in the SPX get equal weighting, instead of the index being weighted on market capitalization) has a YTD return of -13.42%.  This goes to show the complacency in identifying the negative aspects in relation to the SPX's return. There is a clear discrepancy within the individual market breadth, one that has rarely been seen before. There is also a growing complacency by investors who are clearly unaware of the underlying systematic risks at play below the casual surface area of price. For instance, we will examine Apple. Apple is about 7% of all holdings in the SPX tracking ETF, SPY. Also, the top 5 holdings for the SPY ETF (AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, F...
Post a Comment
Read more