Skip to main content

V Shaped Recovery? More like N Shaped Recovery (Part 1).

     The narrative on main-stream media and popular networks such as CNBC continuously perpetuate that the economy is great, that Initial Jobless Claims are declining, and that the stock market is at an all-time high. Everything is good in the world, right? Well, not necessarily. 

    I would first like to bring in question the 10 year Treasury security yield. 

    The usual complacency taking place on CNBC and other mainstream media networks is, to no surprise, that the US economy will create a 'V' shaped recovery, one that has a sharp decline, then suddenly rebounds. This is simply not the case. This chart clearly depicts that. The 10 year Treasury security yield had its last print at 0.6930. If real growth was in fact evident, we would see a rise in inflation which would subsequently cause yields across the curve to increase. This is not happening. Yields are staying flat near the ZLB, and are likely to stay relatively close to the 0% threshold for quite some time, disproving the fallacy that the "economy is better than ever".
    You must realize that there is more to the market than "stocks". 
    I would also like to bring in how the Federal Reserve literally said that they would let their inflationary target run higher than the usual 2%. This will perpetuate extremely high inflation in the future, which is already being shown by a extremely bullish move in commodities, as well as a devaluing dollar. 


    I will expand more upon inflationary expectations and the Federal Reserve balance sheet in other posts in an effort to keep this post short. 
    I would also like to add that there is considerable downside risk even from here for the 10 year yield. For example, the 10 year Bund (German bond) is trading with a yield of -0.394%. So, there is approximate downside of -1.087%. The ECB tried to fix this problem, and BoJ tried to fix this problem, by massive stimulus and the purchasing of high yield/     investment grade ETFs using unlimited funds, but with no success. The United States might be the next victim of negative rates.
 In summary, there is still considerable downside in the 10 year Treasury security. It would be wise to lighten up on Treasury fixed-income exposure, taking down your net Duration measure on your portfolio to reduce exposure to interest rate risk. However, I think keeping an overweight asset allocation to treasuries in a risky portfolio would be wise (depending on the core index/factor model you are using).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Potential Short-Sell Opportunity

In my previous post, the S&P 500 was at all-time-highs before dropping to almost -1.5% intraday as of this post. I highlighted how market participants, particularly those with superior information, were positioning for a moderate pullback in the short term. This post will explain the potential opportunity resulting from this pullback.  Market Breadth I would first like to mention a simple, yet power multi-factor model that incorporates price, volume, and volatility. As of today's close, the SPY's (an ETF that tracks the S&P 500 index) volume on today's poor performance (SPY rebounded from nearly -1.4% to -0.62%) accelerated against its previous trading day, 5 day volume average, 15 day volume average, 30 day volume average, as well as the 90 day volume average by +47.72%, +50.32%, +44.40%, +30.14%, and +29.69%, respectively, with the VIX index climbing by +6.39% to 19.48. This is what you do not want to see as a bullish investor with respect to volume by market part

One Last Ride

Since my previous post, the S&P 500 has appreciated +3.19% to $4,535.43, with the VIX and VVIX depreciating by -10.03% and -9.21% to 16.41 and 105.48, respectively. My last callout only truly referenced how participants were pricing butterfly securities, implied correlation, and general futures and options positioning in terms of notional contracts. Even then, it was apparent a decent portion of the market (particularly on the ES side) was extremely bearish, with the vast majority being bullish (as evidenced by a lower VIX/VVIX/vol contract positing, etc.). From peak to trough of the S&P500's worst week in several months, on 8/13/2021 to 8/19/2021, the VIX appreciated by over 40% from 15.45 to 21.67, the SPX falling -1.39% from 4468 to 4405.80, and the VVIX appreciating by over 10% from 117.81 to 130.41. As was stated in the previous post, the primary risk factor to be considered was an overreaction in implied volatility, which was clearly seen in this time frame.  One more

The Show Goes On

In an effort to make more consistent posts for this blog, I am going to be posting once per month, at the end of every month. Since my previous post in which I recommended a hedge on the S&P 500, the S&P 500 index has appreciated by +2.83%, with the VVIX and VIX indexes both appreciating by +6.85% and +11.81%, respectively. Since the sudden decline of July 19th, the SPX has risen +3.77%, with the VVIX, VIX, and SVXY (short implied volatility fund, mid-term exposure to VIX curve) -18.27%, -21.33%, and +8.06%, respectively. From July 14-19, the SPX declined -2.65%, with the VVIX, VIX, and SVXY +18.60%, +37.78%, and -9.71%, respectively. One thing I will continue to reiterate is that I am not "bragging" on my "market call-outs", as I believe I do not make those predictions. I am simply summing up the market action during which I analyzed for, and how accurate my expectation for future volatility was. One important clarification: simply because I recommended a h